Industry · Insurance
Insurance data licensing for AI.
Quick answer
Insurers and agencies record claims handling, underwriting decisions, policy wording and customer calls. AI developers building claims triage, underwriting and service tools want this data. Policyholder privacy, regulatory retention rules and carrier agreements must be addressed first.
Business context#
Claims files capture adjuster judgment across thousands of scenarios — exactly the kind of expert reasoning AI systems lack.
- 01Your work records
- 02Personal details removed
- 03You approve the release
- 04Licensed to AI developers
Valuable insurance datasets#
| Dataset | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Claims notes | Adjuster reasoning and actions |
| Underwriting files | Risk assessments and decisions |
| Policy documents | Wordings and endorsements |
| Call recordings | First notice of loss and service calls |
| Damage photos | Images linked to claim outcomes |
How AI developers use it#
- Claims triage
- Underwriting copilots
- Policy Q&A assistants
- Damage assessment vision models
Privacy, legal and security considerations#
- Policyholder PII and health data
- State and national insurance regulation
- Carrier and MGA agreements
- Recording consent
How SourceX approaches it#
We start with a description of your systems — no data leaves your company during assessment. If there's relevant demand, we propose scope, permitted use and preparation requirements for your approval, and nothing is delivered without an executed agreement and your explicit authorization.
Related data categories
Systems that hold this data#
- Zendesk
- Intercom
- Freshdesk
- Salesforce Service Cloud
- QuickBooks
- Xero
- NetSuite
- SAP
- Zoom
- Gong
- Five9
- Twilio
- Contact-center platforms
- Confluence
- Notion
- Google Drive
- SharePoint
How much data is enough#
As a general guide, buyers look for years of consistent history (typically 2+ years) and tens of thousands of records or more in one system. Smaller sets can qualify when the work is rare. Assessed deal by deal.
Sample record
Illustrative · fictional
- record_id
- rec_8f21c0
- created / closed
- 2023-04-11 → 2023-04-12
- category
- Billing question
- request
- Customer [NAME] asks why invoice [ID] was charged twice.
- steps
- 1. Checked payment log 2. Found duplicate 3. Issued refund
- outcome
- Resolved · refund issued
- actors
- customer, agent_tier1
Rules that may apply
Federal Wiretap Act 18 U.S.C. 2511
Applies to recorded calls and intercepted communications; some states require all-party consent. Assessed deal by deal.
California Consumer Privacy Act Cal. Civ. Code 1798.100 et seq.
May apply where records include personal information of California residents and the business meets the law's thresholds. Assessed deal by deal.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.
Applies to nonpublic personal information held by financial institutions. Assessed deal by deal.
Reviewer note: applicability is confirmed with counsel for each deal. Not legal advice.
All industries · Software · Manufacturing · Logistics
Frequently asked questions
Are agencies or carriers better placed?
Both can hold valuable data; agencies should check carrier agreements on data ownership.
Related resources
- QuestionDo AI labs buy financial data?
- IndustryBPO & contact centers data
- IndustryConstruction data
- DataInternal knowledge bases
- DataSales call transcripts
- QuestionCan CRM data be licensed?
- InsightCan I license my zoom and gong call recordings data to AI companies?
- InsightCan you license spreadsheets and financial models to AI companies?
- InsightHow do I de-identify contracts and legal documents for AI training?
- SolutionWhat is AI evaluation data?
- SolutionHow AI developers source data
- GlossaryAI training data
See if your company qualifies
A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.