Industry · Software
Software data licensing for AI.
Quick answer
Software companies hold code repositories, code reviews, issue histories, technical documentation and support tickets. Coding-model and agent developers value real engineering workflows. Open-source licenses, customer data processing agreements and embedded secrets must be checked.
Business context#
Public code is widely used for training; private codebases with review history and linked issues show how professional teams actually build and fix software.
- 01Your work records
- 02Personal details removed
- 03You approve the release
- 04Licensed to AI developers
Valuable software datasets#
| Dataset | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Repositories | Proprietary source code with history |
| Pull requests and reviews | Review comments and revisions |
| Issue trackers | Bugs, triage and resolution |
| Technical docs | Architecture and runbooks |
| Support tickets | Customer problems and fixes |
How AI developers use it#
- Coding models
- Code-review assistants
- Software engineering agents
- Support copilots
Privacy, legal and security considerations#
- Open-source license obligations
- Customer DPAs
- Secrets and credentials in history
- Trade secrets
How SourceX approaches it#
We start with a description of your systems — no data leaves your company during assessment. If there's relevant demand, we propose scope, permitted use and preparation requirements for your approval, and nothing is delivered without an executed agreement and your explicit authorization.
Related data categories
Systems that hold this data#
- Zendesk
- Intercom
- Freshdesk
- Salesforce Service Cloud
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Bitbucket
- Jira
- Asana
- Procore
- Monday.com
- Confluence
- Notion
- Google Drive
- SharePoint
How much data is enough#
As a general guide, buyers look for years of consistent history (typically 2+ years) and tens of thousands of records or more in one system. Smaller sets can qualify when the work is rare. Assessed deal by deal.
Sample record
Illustrative · fictional
- record_id
- rec_8f21c0
- created / closed
- 2023-04-11 → 2023-04-12
- category
- Billing question
- request
- Customer [NAME] asks why invoice [ID] was charged twice.
- steps
- 1. Checked payment log 2. Found duplicate 3. Issued refund
- outcome
- Resolved · refund issued
- actors
- customer, agent_tier1
Rules that may apply
Federal Wiretap Act 18 U.S.C. 2511
Applies to recorded calls and intercepted communications; some states require all-party consent. Assessed deal by deal.
California Consumer Privacy Act Cal. Civ. Code 1798.100 et seq.
May apply where records include personal information of California residents and the business meets the law's thresholds. Assessed deal by deal.
Reviewer note: applicability is confirmed with counsel for each deal. Not legal advice.
All industries · Manufacturing · Logistics · Real estate
Frequently asked questions
Will I expose my product?
You can license selected repositories or exclude core IP entirely.
Related resources
- IndustryFintech software data
- IndustryBPO & contact centers data
- GlossaryEnterprise data
- QuestionCan SaaS data be licensed?
- QuestionPublic data vs proprietary data: what's the difference for AI?
- InsightCan SaaS companies sell their data to AI companies?
- DataCode review records
- DataInternal knowledge bases
- InsightHow does AI training data licensing work?
- InsightCan property management companies sell their data to AI companies?
- SolutionOperational data: the step-by-step record of how work gets done
- SolutionWhat is AI evaluation data?
See if your company qualifies
A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.