Getting started
IP audit checklist for mid-size companies: include your records
By SourceX Editorial · Reviewed by Noah Loul ·
Short answer
An IP audit checklist for a mid-size company should cover patents, trademarks, copyrights, software, trade secrets and contracts, and it should add a records section. Operational records rarely appear on the balance sheet, yet they raise ownership, confidentiality and licensing questions. The rule: list each system of record, its authors, its controls and every contract that limits its use.
Key takeaways
- Most IP audit checklists stop at registrations and code; a records section catches ownership and confidentiality gaps in support, CRM, project and job systems.
- Internally built records are generally expensed under US GAAP, so the balance sheet will not point you to them.
- Trade secret protection depends on reasonable measures, so access controls and confidentiality agreements belong on the checklist.
- Documents written by contractors usually need a written assignment; a work-for-hire clause alone is often not enough.
- The records section needs metadata, not exports: system names, date ranges, authors, controls and restrictions.
What a mid-size IP audit should cover#
A mid-size IP audit should cover every asset the company relies on to compete and every contract that grants or limits rights in it. For most mid-size companies that means a short register per category, kept by the general counsel or outside counsel, rather than a valuation exercise.
This checklist is general information, not legal advice. How ownership, trade secret and contract rules apply to your company is a question to work through with counsel.
- Patents and patent applications, with owners of record and maintenance status.
- Trademarks, trade names and domain names, with registrations and renewal dates.
- Copyrights in software, documentation, training content and marketing material.
- Trade secrets such as pricing logic, processes and know-how, with the controls that protect them.
- Software: proprietary code, open-source components and the licenses attached to each.
- Inbound licenses: software, content and data used under someone else's terms.
- Outbound licenses: anything already granted, including any exclusivity.
- Records: the operational histories in support, CRM, project, job, order and quality systems.
Why operational records belong on the list#
Operational records belong on the list because they raise the same questions as other IP, namely ownership, confidentiality and permitted use, yet they are usually invisible in the books. ASC 350-30-25-3 has companies expense, as incurred, what they spend creating intangibles in-house when those intangibles cannot be specifically identified or are inherent in the ongoing business. Years of support tickets, CRM histories and job records therefore rarely show up as assets.
Acquisitions are the exception. Under ASC 805, an acquired intangible is recognized separately from goodwill if it arises from contractual or legal rights or is separable, and the Codification's examples list databases among technology-based intangibles. Records tend to become visible on a balance sheet only when someone buys the company that holds them.
Records also sit behind decisions the audit should inform: a system migration that may drop history, a financing or sale with IP representations, and any proposal to license records to AI developers.
- 01Your work records
- 02Personal details removed
- 03You approve the release
- 04Licensed to AI developers
The records section of the checklist#
The records section lists each system of record with enough metadata to show who owns the contents, how they are protected and what limits their use. It needs no exports or samples; system owners can answer most items from admin consoles and signed contracts.
| Checklist item | What to record | Where to look |
|---|---|---|
| Systems of record | System names for support, CRM, project, job, order and quality records | IT asset list, SaaS billing, admin consoles |
| Accessible history | Date range that can still be exported, and gaps from past migrations | System settings, retention policies, migration notes |
| Authors | Employees, contractors, customers, vendors or automated sources | HR and vendor records, system user lists |
| Ownership terms | Employee and contractor IP clauses, client deliverable terms | Offer letters, contractor agreements, client MSAs |
| Confidentiality controls | Access roles, NDAs, classification labels | Admin roles, HR files, security policies |
| Vendor restrictions | Export limits and terms on AI training or data use | Vendor terms of service and order forms |
| Personal and sensitive data | Customer, employee or candidate details present | Field lists, privacy notices, data processing agreements |
| Holds and retention | Legal holds, deletion schedules, regulatory retention | Litigation files, retention schedules |
| Third-party content | Manuals, standards, client files or code embedded in records | Attachment reports and a small sample review |
Ownership checks: employees, contractors and clients#
Ownership checks confirm that what people wrote in your systems actually belongs to the company. Under the Copyright Act, when a work is made for hire the employer is considered the author and, unless a signed written instrument says otherwise, owns all of the rights in the copyright; work by an employee within the scope of employment qualifies.
Contractors are where gaps appear. The Copyright Office explains that a commissioned work is made for hire only if it falls within specific statutory categories and the parties sign a written agreement, so freelance developers, drafters and consultants usually need an express assignment. Client contracts can cut the other way by assigning deliverables or restricting reuse of anything built for the client.
- Confirm employee agreements include invention and work-product assignment language.
- Pull contractor agreements for anyone who wrote code, documentation or project records, and check for a written assignment.
- Flag client contracts that assign deliverables or restrict reuse of client materials.
- Note acquired companies whose records came with their own legacy agreements.
Trade secret hygiene checks#
Trade secret checks test whether the company has done enough to keep valuable records confidential. The Defend Trade Secrets Act sets two conditions: the owner must take reasonable measures to keep the information secret, and the information must have independent economic value because others do not know it and cannot readily find it out by proper means.
Department of Justice guidance describes protective measures as reasonable under the circumstances rather than absolute, citing examples such as telling employees a trade secret exists, limiting access on a need-to-know basis, requiring confidentiality agreements and keeping documents locked. A shared drive open to every employee and former contractor weakens that position.
One detail is often missed. The act requires employers to give notice of whistleblower immunity in employee contracts that govern trade secrets or confidential information, and an employer that skips the notice may not recover exemplary damages or attorney fees against an employee who did not receive it. Check that current templates, including contractor and consultant agreements, include the notice.
| Control | Evidence to collect | Red flag |
|---|---|---|
| Access limits | Role lists for support, CRM, code and project systems | Former staff or contractors still active |
| Confidentiality agreements | Signed NDAs and employment agreements | Older templates never updated |
| Whistleblower immunity notice | Current employee, contractor and consultant templates | Notice missing from confidentiality terms |
| Marking and classification | Labels on confidential folders, spaces and exports | Sensitive records with no label |
| Sharing outside the company | NDAs with customers, partners and vendors who see records | Records sent to third parties with no confidentiality terms |
Licenses in and out: what already limits use#
Existing licenses show what the company can still do with its records. Inbound software terms may restrict exports, automated extraction or use of data for AI training, and client and partner agreements may limit reuse of anything they supplied. Outbound, any exclusive grant already made narrows future options.
Read the vendor terms for each system of record, not only the largest ones, because helpdesk, CRM and project tools often carry different rules. Record each restriction against its system in the register so the restriction travels with the records into any later migration, sale or license.
Illustrative: an engineering firm adds records to its audit#
Illustrative: a fictional civil engineering firm runs an IP audit before a planned recapitalization. The first pass covers its trademarks, a few in-house software tools and its standard contract forms. The general counsel then adds a records section covering Deltek Vantagepoint project histories, Bluebeam markup sessions, internal QA review comments and staffing plans.
The records section surfaces three findings. Internal QA reviews and project scoping records were written by employees and are company-owned. Several freelance drafters signed agreements with a work-for-hire clause but no assignment. A group of public-sector client contracts transfers ownership of deliverables to the client.
The firm fixes its contractor template, logs deliverables by contract form and restricts access to QA records. The result is a records register the board and any future buyer can read alongside the trademark and software lists, with each record family marked company-owned, client-controlled or needing review.
How SourceX uses the records section#
SourceX's rights review asks the same questions as the records section of an IP audit. In the SourceX five-step transaction, Supply, Rights, Preparation, Approval and Delivery, the Rights step checks authorship, client terms, vendor restrictions and confidentiality before any record family is scoped for a license.
A company that already keeps a records register shortens that review, and its answers feed the SourceX Evidence Packet: provenance, licensing rights, permitted use, the privacy record and release authorization. Nothing is shared during the initial fit check, which uses metadata only.
Frequently asked questions
When should a mid-size company run an IP audit?
Run one at trigger events rather than on a fixed calendar: before a financing, an acquisition or sale, a major system migration or retirement, a new outbound license, or a leadership change. Update the records register whenever a system of record is added or shut down, because history is often lost in migrations.
Who should own the records section?
Counsel should own the legal conclusions, but the facts come from system owners: the CTO or IT lead for systems and exports, the COO for operational records, and HR for employee and contractor agreements. One named owner, usually in the general counsel's office, keeps the register current.
Does the audit require copying or exporting records?
No. The records section relies on metadata such as system names, date ranges, authors, controls and contract terms. Samples become relevant only later, if the company decides to license a specific record family and a rights review needs a closer look at what the records contain.
Should the audit put a value on the records?
An IP audit is usually not a valuation. For a sense of external value, the SourceX Enterprise Data Value Framework offers qualitative drivers such as uniqueness, domain expertise, recency, rights and AI utility, with preparation cost and privacy burden reducing net value. It describes value drivers and does not produce a price.
Do acquired companies need their own records section?
Yes. Acquired companies often bring legacy systems, older contractor agreements and customer contracts with different reuse terms. Treat each acquired entity's records as a separate line in the register until a rights review confirms which agreements still govern them.
Sources
- ASC 350-30-25-3 requires costs of internally developing intangible assets that are not specifically identifiable or are inherent in a continuing business to be expensed when incurred. Source
- Under ASC 805, an acquired intangible is recognized separately from goodwill if it arises from contractual or legal rights or is separable, and the examples list databases among technology-based intangible assets. Source
- 17 U.S.C. 201(b): for a work made for hire, the employer is considered the author and, unless otherwise agreed in a signed written instrument, owns all rights in the copyright. Source
- Copyright Office Circular 30: a commissioned work is made for hire only in certain statutory categories and under an express written agreement. Source
- Under 18 U.S.C. 1839(3), information is a trade secret only if the owner took reasonable measures to keep it secret and it derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable through proper means. Source
- DOJ guidance states trade secret protective measures must be reasonable under the circumstances, citing examples such as advising employees, need-to-know access, confidentiality agreements and locked documents. Source
- 18 U.S.C. 1833(b) requires employers to give notice of whistleblower immunity in contracts with employees governing use of trade secrets or confidential information. Source
- An employer that fails to give the 1833(b) notice may not recover exemplary damages or attorney fees against an employee who did not receive it; the requirement covers contractors and consultants. Source
Related resources
- QuestionWho owns enterprise data?
- InsightCan law firms sell their data to AI companies?
- InsightCan engineering firms sell their data to AI companies?
- InsightProprietary algorithms in your code: exclude or include?
- SolutionOperational data: the step-by-step record of how work gets done
- IndustryHealthcare administration data
See if your company qualifies
A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.