Skip to content

Question

Why do AI agents need business data?

By SourceX Editorial · Updated

Short answer

AI agents are meant to complete tasks, not just answer questions. To learn and be tested on real tasks, they need examples of how people actually do the work: the steps, tools, decisions, exceptions and results. That information lives in business systems, not on the public internet.

Part of: How licensing works

Explanation#

Ticketing, CRM, code review and approval systems record sequences of actions and outcomes.

These records can provide training examples and realistic evaluation tasks for agents.

Rights and privacy#

  • Confirm customer, vendor and employee agreements allow the use
  • Remove or de-identify personal details before anything leaves the company
  • Approve the final dataset and permitted uses in writing

How licensing works#

A business describes its data, buyer demand is assessed, scope and permitted use are proposed, the data is prepared and de-identified, an agreement is signed, and the approved dataset is delivered. See data licensing for detail.

Related questions

General information, not legal advice. Editorial policy.

What is an AI agent?#

An AI agent is a system in which a large language model decides its own next steps and which tools to use, rather than following a fixed script. Anthropic draws the line this way: workflows orchestrate models and tools through predefined code paths, while agents let the model dynamically direct its own process and tool usage.

In practice an agent runs in a loop. It reads the goal, calls a tool such as a search, an API or a code runner, looks at the result, and decides what to do next. Anthropic notes that agents need ground truth from the environment at each step, such as tool results or code execution, to judge whether they are making progress.

AI agent vs LLM: what is the difference?#

An LLM is the model that produces text from a prompt; an agent is a system built around an LLM that acts on tools, checks results and keeps going until the task is done or a stopping rule is hit. The same model can power a chatbot or an agent; what changes is the loop, the tools and the responsibility for an outcome.

AI agent vs LLM: what is the difference?
AspectLLM on its ownAI agent
Unit of workOne response to one promptA multi-step task with a goal
ToolsNone unless a developer adds themCalls APIs, search, code or business systems
FeedbackNo view of what happens after it answersReads tool results each step and adjusts
When it stopsAfter producing a replyWhen the task completes or a stopping condition, such as a maximum number of iterations, is reached
How it is judgedQuality of the textWhether the end state is correct and rules were followed

Which business records map to which agent tasks?#

The examples below are illustrative, not a list of what any particular buyer wants; each record shows the request, the steps taken and the outcome.

  • The record shows the starting request, not only the final answer.
  • Intermediate steps and status changes are timestamped.
  • The outcome is recorded, including failures and reopened cases.
  • The rules the team followed (policies, approval limits) can be described.
Which business records map to which agent tasks?
SystemExample recordAgent task it can teach or test
Help desk (Zendesk, Freshdesk)Ticket thread with status changes and resolutionTriage, reply and resolve a customer request
CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot)Opportunity history with activities and stage changesUpdate records and decide next sales actions
Issue tracker (Jira, GitHub)Issue linked to code changes and review commentsFix a reported bug and pass review
ERP and finance (NetSuite)Invoice, approval chain and payment statusMatch, approve or flag transactions under policy
Field service (ServiceTitan)Job from booking to dispatch to closeoutSchedule work and handle exceptions

How are AI agents tested on real work?#

Agent benchmarks are increasingly built from real work records, with success measured by whether the end state is correct. SWE-bench, for example, uses 2,294 problems drawn from real GitHub issues and the pull requests that resolved them across 12 popular Python repositories.

tau-bench tests agents in a simulated conversation with a user, giving the agent domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines, and scores it by comparing the final database state with an annotated goal state. Both designs depend on knowing what correct work looked like, which is exactly what business system histories record.

When a company licenses records for this use, it approves exactly what is released, once per deal, and sees what would leave the company before anything is shared.

Sources for this section

  • Anthropic defines agents as systems where LLMs dynamically direct their own processes and tool usage, using environmental feedback in a loop with stopping conditions. Source
  • SWE-bench includes 2,294 software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and pull requests across 12 Python repositories. Source
  • tau-bench gives agents domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines and evaluates them by comparing the final database state with a goal state. Source

Related resources

See if your company qualifies

A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.

See if your company qualifies